Immediate implant placement by using natural bovine bone substitute and acellular collagen matrix
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56939/DBR23146mKeywords:
Immediate implant placement, natural bovine bone, acellular collagen matrixAbstract
Adequate bone and soft tissue volume is important to allow proper implants osseointegration, survival and esthetic result. The aim of this case report was to observe an immediate implant placement by using natural bovine bone substitute and acellular collagen matrix to gain better soft tissue result. Upon screw-retained provisional bridge removal after four months, a successful peri-implant soft tissue healing was observed. Then one year after final bridge, a stable soft and hard tissue situation, as well as sufficient implant stability, granules osteointegration into newly formed bone was recorded.
References
U. Grunder, S. Gracis, and M. Capelli, “Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics.,” Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 113–9, Apr. 2005.
A. D’Addona, M. Ghassemian, L. Raffaelli, and P. F. Manicone, “Soft and Hard Tissue Management in Implant Therapy—Part I: Surgical Concepts,” Int J Biomater, vol. 2012, 2012, doi: 10.1155/2012/531202.
W. Lee, “Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets,” J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, vol. 47, no. 1, p. 57, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.5125/JKAOMS.2021.47.1.57.
W. Wang and K. W. K. Yeung, “Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review,” Bioact Mater, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 224, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.BIOACTMAT.2017.05.007.
A. Lysov and A. P. Saadoun, “Periodontal, Functional, and Esthetic Integration of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue: WHS Concept,” J Oral Implantol, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. S1–S8, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-21-00103.
B. Trajkovski, M. Jaunich, W. D. Müller, F. Beuer, G. G. Zafiropoulos, and A. Houshmand, “Hydrophilicity, Viscoelastic, and Physicochemical Properties Variations in Dental Bone Grafting Substitutes,” Materials (Basel), vol. 11, no. 2, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.3390/MA11020215.
D. Rothamel, F. Schwarz, M. Sager, M. Herten, A. Sculean, and J. Becker, “Biodegradation of differently crosslinked collagen membranes: An experimental study in the rat,” Clin Oral Implants Res, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 369–378, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01108.x.
A. Kasaj et al., “The influence of various rehydration protocols on biomechanical properties of different acellular tissue matrices,” Clin Oral Investig, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1303–1315, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1007/S00784-015-1614-1/METRICS.
G. G. Zafiropoulos, A. A. Al-Asfour, M. Abuzayeda, Z. P. Kačarević, C. A. Murray, and B. Trajkovski, “Peri-implant mucosa augmentation with an acellular collagen matrix,” Membranes (Basel), vol. 11, no. 9, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/membranes11090698.
H. J. Haugen, S. P. Lyngstadaas, F. Rossi, and G. Perale, “Bone grafts: which is the ideal biomaterial?,” J Clin Periodontol, vol. 46 Suppl 21, no. S21, pp. 92–102, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1111/JCPE.13058.
F. Riachi et al., “Influence of material properties on rate of resorption of two bone graft materials after sinus lift using radiographic assessment,” Int J Dent, vol. 737262, no. 10, p. 31, 2012.
P. A. Fugazzotto, “GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membranes. Part 2: Clinical results,” Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent., vol. 23, 2003.
D. Rothamel et al., “Biocompatibility and biodegradation of a native porcine pericardium membrane: results of in vitro and in vivo examinations.,” Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012.
A. M. Pabst et al., “In vitro and in vivo characterization of porcine acellular dermal matrix for gingival augmentation procedures,” J Periodontal Res, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 371–381, 2014, doi: 10.1111/jre.12115.
A. M. Pabst, K. M. Lehmann, C. Walter, M. Krüger, S. I. Stratul, and A. Kasaj, “Influence of porcine-derived collagen matrix on endothelial progenitor cells: an in vitro study,” Odontology, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 19–26, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10266-014-0186-x.
R. Cosgarea, R. Miron, R. Bora, A. Rosu, S. Buduru, and A. Sculean, “Long-term results after treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel and a porcine acellular dermal matrix,” Quintessence Int (Berl), vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 32–44, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a45171.
M. Stefanini, A. Rendon, and G. Zucchelli, “Porcine-Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix for Buccal Soft Tissue Augmentation at Single Implant Sites: A 1-Year Follow-up Case Series,” Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 121–128, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.11607/prd.4477.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Elie Maalouf , Fady Abillamaa, Cynthia Chemaly , Branko Trajkovski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles in IJDBR (OTA Publiciranje/Publishing) are open access articles and are being distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
